Anonymous
My feedback
-
969 votes
Hi,
We are working to fully support sync slicers in the custom visuals platform.
The only supported case (for now) is when custom viz slicer is using one data field. it is a limitation and we are working on it.Thanks,
RaninAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
805 votes
Hi everyone,
Thanks for your feedback on this. We don’t have this feature in our short term plans, but it’s something on our long term backlog that we’ll consider for a future release.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
546 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
622 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
1,254 votes
At the moment we don’t have any plans to implement this. It sounds like it’s mostly useful for learning/training? If there are other ‘production’ scenarios that you think it’d be useful, where a regular table/matrix wouldn’t work, please let us know in the comments!
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
1,770 votes
From the comments and scenarios everyone’s describing, the problem is really that you need a way to allow end-users to change which measure is displayed in a visual on the fly.
As a few folks have mentioned, the FORMAT function might help in the interim, as long as you’re showing the results in text rather than a chart. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dax/format-function-dax has details on how to use that.
The expression-based formatting feature that we’ve started work on may help to a certain extent, but that’s really designed to change a visual’s properties rather than the data type or format. We’ll look into extending that work to support this scenario as well.
We’re moving this to Backlog status – our core plan is to build ways that end-users can change the dimensions or measures that are visible in a chart on the fly. They’ll be able to explore much more freely rather than…
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
195 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
51 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
271 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
319 votes
Thanks for submitting. We are looking to make some improvements in this area.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
13 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
21 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
48 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
343 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
419 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
398 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
228 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
770 votes
Thanks for the suggestions! I’ve split out the other cloud storage options into separate ideas for people to vote on.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
10 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
16 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
Yes! This is super-frustrating and time consuming to have to re-arrange all of my tables every time I need to look at or modify the schema!