on
RE:
Allocation Accounts can't be used when approval workflows are implemented... To me this is clearly a bug that needs to be fixed. Right now, these two valuable features don't work together and a BC users need to determine which feature is more important to them and then they can't use the other. This is unfortunate.This doesn't work because the Allocation Account feature inserts additional entries to approved transactions, which isn't allowed by the workflow controls. Just like I can't modify an approved entry without it needing to be approved again, the Allocation Account feature can't insert its additional entries. The workflow approval stops it from posting.
RE:
I signed in here to ask for exactly the same, glad someone else already started the thought. I expect this would probably need to take the form of tighter integration with Teams, where creating a Fabric workspace simultaneously creates a Team, at least from the perspective of communicating. And, looking at it from a different perspective, how about the capability of assigning security access for members of a Teams channel, to a Fabric workspace? Thanks!
RE:
This feature is highly recommended to be added in upcoming releases. We are currently manually processing where we close the books and have to get the opening data Dimension wise on few accounts only.
RE:
This would be fantastic!!
RE:
We were asked the exact same thing and we would like to see this working with regular email templates in Power Apps / Dynamics 365 Sales
RE:
We are having major issues due to this for Reporting Offload.
RE:
Hi, any update on the status of this?
RE:
Must need this feature as early as possible as without this we can not proceed with any implementation at project level, which demands dynamic parameterization of data flow gen2.
RE:
This is something we are also experiencing problems with and it would be really good if it could be implemented!
RE:
Hello Kishor Mistry,thank you for the tip. In practice, this will probably happen very rarely, but it is clear that the example must also be possible on the system side.I see two possibilities for this case:Option 1:Both shipping numbers are printed in the comment line. I would probably completely balance the first shipment line booked and the remaining quantity in the second:Shipment No xxx Date xx.xx.xxxx and Shipment No xxx Date xx.xx.xxxx and Line 1 Item A, Ship Qty 8Shipment No xxx Date xx.xx.xxxx and Shipment No xxx Date xx.xx.xxxx and Line 2 Item B, Ship Qty 8Shipment No xxx Date xx.xx.xxxx and Shipment No xxx Date xx.xx.xxxx and Line 3, Item C, Ship Qty 8Option 2:A separate invoice line is created for each shipment line. I would probably completely balance the first shipment line booked and the remaining quantity in the second:Shipment No xxx Date xx.xx.xxxx Line 1, Item A, Ship Qty 5Shipment No xxx Date xx.xx.xxxxLine 1, Item A, Ship Qty 3Shipment No xxx Date xx.xx.xxxx Line 2, Item B, Ship Qty 5Shipment No xxx Date xx.xx.xxxxLine 2, Item B, Ship Qty 3Shipment No xxx Date xx.xx.xxxx Line 3, Item C, Ship Qty 5Shipment No xxx Date xx.xx.xxxxLine 3 Item C, Ship Qty 3