RE:
I am really confused as to why this was NOT implemented. The code is already there, is it not?
RE:
It would be better if it opened a dialog box with the active batch jobs against the user, and give the option to move them to another account (like a generic admin account).
RE:
Thank you! I see both changes.If we could get the capacity column as a filter and be able to export more than a single artifact history - that would be great!
RE:
If only a person could manage the alerts, it would create dependencies and directly affect the availability of these people. Currently, only the owner can set the alert threshold, which makes it challenging to get approval for production environments
RE:
Agree--there's no reason for users with view only to see this, and yet they get it and are asking questions.
RE:
I hope this gets the support it needs to make it on the roadmap. Most of our maintenance workers will work in pairs and there are some jobs that require 3 people. This does not include jobs that involve hot work or confined spaces when an additional attendant is required to complete the job. Either way forecasting and scheduling are not correct and it is a trade off between the forecast and having to manually schedule work orders.
RE:
Is this still on the Roadmap?